Product guide · Exam management for certification bodies

Every exam, from first draft question to final report, in one platform your board can rely on.

Examfolio is one web platform for the whole life of an exam. Committees write and approve questions, build the exam, deliver it to candidates in the browser, score it and analyse how questions and candidates performed, all under one login and from one question bank.

ForSpecialist boards, residency and fellowship programmes, certification bodiesCandidates needA modern browser

A good examination should become better every time it is conducted.The principle Examfolio is built around

What it isA single platform covering authoring, review, exam building, delivery, scoring and analysis.
Who it servesBoards that run multiple-choice exams across many countries and must defend their results.
What sets it apartEvery delivered exam is frozen as a permanent snapshot, so any result can be traced years later.

Most examination boards run their exams across two or three separate tools: a question bank, a delivery system and a spreadsheet for results. Every handover between them is a manual export, a chance of error and a gap in the audit trail.

Examfolio removes the handovers. The question bank feeds the exam directly, the exam is delivered and scored in the same place, and the statistics flow back to the questions that produced them.

Built for how boards work

The workflows are the ones examination boards already use: screening and validation, committee meetings, authors restricted to their specialty, Angoff standard setting and KR-20 reliability. They are part of the platform from the start.

ValueOne system replaces the exports, re-keying and reconciliation that sit between today's question bank, delivery tool and results spreadsheet.
25locations across Europe, examining at the same time

In use · European Board of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · EFORT Foundation

Examfolio has run international specialist examinations held simultaneously at 25 locations across Europe. The customers report fewer administrative difficulties and lower examination costs.

[Customer quote and name to be added once approved for publication]

Overview

Who Examfolio is for

Examfolio is built for organisations that run academic, professional and specialist examinations, where the result decides entry to a fellowship, completion of training or certification.

Specialist medical boardsResidency and fellowship programmesUniversities and medical schoolsAcademic societiesProfessional certification bodiesInternational examination boardsPostgraduate training programmes

An exam for 50 candidates in one room and an exam for candidates spread across several countries run on the same platform.

Who uses it inside your organisation

Each organisation gets its own fully separated workspace. Inside it, a person can hold any combination of eight roles, and the menu shows only what those roles allow.

RoleWhat they do
AdministratorConfigures the workspace, manages users and sees everything
Question authorWrites and revises questions
ScreenerGives new questions a first review
ValidatorGives final approval and follows up on quality after exams
TranslatorTranslates questions and localised images
Committee memberEdits, builds and reviews exams together with colleagues
CandidateRegisters for and sits exams, and sees their own results
Location supervisorRuns a test centre and oversees the candidates sitting there
ValueOne login works across organisations. A committee member who serves two societies switches between them from the header, with a single account.

Overview

The improvement cycle

Examfolio connects four parts of specialist assessment. Develop the question bank, deliver the exam, protect its integrity, and learn from the results. What each exam teaches you feeds straight into the next one, so your examination programme becomes a learning system.

In practice an exam moves through seven stages. The first three happen in the question bank, the lock turns the chosen questions into a permanent exam, and the last three run from that locked record.

BEFORE THE EXAM · QUESTION BANK1 · Writeauthors draft questions2 · Reviewscreen, validate, approve3 · Composehand-picked or auto-filled4 · Locka permanent snapshot5 · Deliverin the browser, any device6 · Scoreautomatic on submission7 · Analyseexam and item statisticsITEM STATISTICS INFORM THE NEXT EXAMON THE DAY AND AFTER · FROM THE SNAPSHOT
Figure 1. Nothing leaves the platform between stages. The statistics from each exam flow back to the questions that produced them, so every sitting improves the bank.

Develop

A question bank your committee can trust

Questions are written, reviewed, translated and versioned in one place. Every question keeps its full history: who changed it, when, and the comment they left.

A new version never overwrites the old one. A question that has appeared in a delivered exam can only be versioned, so the record of what candidates saw stays intact.

DEFAULT STATUS FLOW · CONFIGURABLE PER ORGANISATIONNewReviewScreenedApprovedTrustedREVISE · BACK TO THE AUTHOR, COMMENT REQUIRED WHERE YOU SET IT
Figure 2. Your organisation decides which roles may move a question between which statuses, and where a comment is mandatory. Every transition is kept in the question's history.
FormatsSingle best answer, multiple choice, true/false and extended matching, with images, audio, video and documents.
MetadataCategory, difficulty, quality, tags, notes, references and a three-level curriculum map.
TranslationStems, options and images per language, with progress shown on the question.
Finding questionsFilters on status, author, curriculum and measured discrimination. Views live in the URL and can be shared.
Specialty accessAuthors can be limited to their own specialties, with a meeting mode that opens the full pool.
ImportBulk CSV import with preview, a chosen starting status and a row-by-row error report.
examfolio · Question 1042 · version 3
Screenshot: the question editor

A stem with an image, the options and the translation panel open in a second language, with the version chain visible.

ScreenshotFigure 3. The question editor with translations side by side.
ValueThe committee works from one bank with a complete history, and a delivered exam can never be changed by a later edit.

Develop

Optional module

AI question generator: first drafts in your board's own voice

AIOff by default, and the committee stays in charge. An administrator switches the generator on. Every question it drafts goes through your normal review before it can appear in an exam.

An author tells the generator what is needed: the category, the curriculum area, the difficulty, the format, how many questions, and a topic focus. A multi-stage pipeline then drafts the questions in your organisation's measured writing style, revises them against established item-writing rules, and scores each one from 0 to 100 with a written critique.

The batch lands in a staging area. The author reads each draft with its score and critique, then edits it, discards it or accepts it into the pool.

THE GENERATORTHE AUTHORBriefwhat, how many, focusDraftin your house styleReviseitem-writing rulesScore0 to 100 and a critiqueStaging areaevery draft reviewedDiscardnever enters the poolEditthen acceptAcceptinto the poolQuestion banknormal review · tagged AI-generated
Figure 4. The generator drafts, revises and scores. Only an author moves a question into the pool, and it then follows the same status flow as any human-written question.
IllustrationFigure 5. How a draft is reviewed in the staging area. To be replaced with a product screenshot.

What the generator does

Drafting aid

  • Writes in your organisation's measured house style
  • Revises each draft against item-writing rules
  • Scores each question and explains the score
  • Attaches a rationale and references

What the expert decides

Asked of every draft

  • Is it factually correct?
  • Does it test the intended knowledge or competency?
  • Is the level right for this exam?
  • Is the correct answer unambiguous?
  • Are the distractors plausible and still clearly wrong?
  • Does it meet our examination standards?

Only after the normal review and approval does a question join the bank.

Step 1AI proposes.
Step 2Experts refine.
Step 3The board approves.

Fill thin areas of the blueprint

Use case

Point the generator at a curriculum area with too few approved questions and hand authors a batch to work on.

Give authors a strong first draft

Use case

The critique shows where a draft needs work, so committee time goes on judgement and subject expertise.

ValueThe bank grows faster where the blueprint needs it, and every new question still passes through the committee that owns the exam.

Develop

Building and locking an exam

An exam set is built by picking questions from the pool and ordering them by drag and drop, or by letting Examfolio fill it: how many questions per category, which statuses are eligible, and which earlier exams to exclude so questions are not reused.

Locking the set freezes every stem, option, image and translation into a snapshot with a cryptographic fingerprint. Questions can be edited, versioned or re-translated afterwards without touching the exam. Delivery, scoring, results and reports always use the snapshot.

QUESTION BANKQuestion 1042 · version 3editable in the bankNEW VERSIONQuestion 1042 · version 4revised after the examLockfingerprintedEXAM SNAPSHOT · FROZENStems · options · images · translationsExactly what candidates saw, kept permanentlyDelivery, scoring and every report use this recordFINGERPRINT 9F3A 47D0 … C21EChecked whenever the exam is usedDOES NOT REACH THE EXAM
Figure 6. Change the question and the exam does not move. An appeal or an accreditation audit years later is answered from the same record the candidate saw.
  1. Build. Pick by hand, or auto-fill by category from the statuses you allow.
  2. Check. The set warns when a question has been revised since it was added, shows the composition by category and renders a candidate-style preview.
  3. Lock. The snapshot is created and fingerprinted.
  4. Reuse the evidence. The set's analysis tab lists every exam ever delivered from it, with headline statistics.

Export formats

Pearson VUEXMLJSONExamManager XML
ValueWhat a candidate saw can be shown exactly, in minutes, however much the question bank has changed since.

Deliver

Running an exam

An exam is created from a locked set, with a title, candidate instructions, an optional access code, a registration window and an exam window. The exam office runs registration, test centres and communication from the same workspace.

Release settingsPer exam, choose whether candidates see their result, their score and question-by-question feedback.
Fairness settingsQuestion and option order randomised per candidate, and an optional different sample for each.
Test centresLocations accept or decline, keep their own contacts and invigilators, and see their own candidates.
CandidatesSelf-registration or bulk CSV import, with confirmations handled by staff.
AccommodationsExtra time, screen reader, dictation and more. Applied quietly and never shown to the candidate.
EmailTen templates from invitation to results, bulk sending, and an archive copy of every message.
examfolio · Live board
Screenshot: the live board

Every candidate's status and progress during an exam, the count of who needs a look, and one session timeline opened.

ScreenshotFigure 7. While the exam runs, staff see what is happening in plain sentences.
ValueTest centres, candidates and the exam office work from the same record, so lists, instructions and statuses stay in step.

Deliver

The candidate's view

Candidates sit the exam in a browser on any device, with nothing to install. The clock runs on the server, so a changed computer clock has no effect. Questions arrive one at a time, the device never holds the whole exam, and correct answers never reach it.

  1. Before the start the candidate sees exactly what will be recorded, and enters the access code if the exam has one.
  2. During the exam every answer is saved as it is given. A navigator shows answered, viewed, flagged and unanswered questions.
  3. If the connection drops the candidate resumes where they were, with answers, flags and viewed states intact.
  4. At the end a review screen and an explicit confirmation, then a receipt on screen and by email. Time expiry submits automatically.

Two ways to deliver

High-stakes sittings

Scheduled exams

  • Registration and exam windows
  • One or many test centres, or candidates at home
  • Integrity profile set per exam
  • Export to Pearson VUE when an external centre delivers

Self-paced assessments

In the candidate's own time

  • Candidates sit when it suits them
  • The same question bank, scoring and analysis
  • Results and feedback released as you decide

[Add details of the self-paced offer]

examfolio · Exam in progress
Screenshot: the exam screen, Standard profile

A question with the navigator, a flagged item, and the candidate watermark visible across the page.

ScreenshotFigure 8. The candidate's exam screen.
ValueCandidates can sit the exam anywhere, and the question "did my answers save?" stops reaching the exam office.

Protect

Exam integrity

No technology can make cheating impossible. Examfolio takes a layered approach instead: it makes cheating expensive and visible, reports what it finds as observations with their statistical basis, and leaves the final judgement with the board. Candidates are told in advance what is recorded.

  1. Authentication. Each candidate signs in with their own account, plus an access code where the exam uses one.
  2. A controlled environment. Fullscreen required, copy, paste and print blocked, and questions delivered one at a time.
  3. Monitoring during the exam. A focus watchdog warns on screen, and every event goes into a tamper-evident log.
  4. Review after the exam. Answer pattern, timing and behaviour are read together for each candidate.
  5. The board's judgement. Staff see the evidence and decide what, if anything, to act on.
Entry to a fellowshipCompletion of residencySpecialist certificationProfessional progression

When the result decides outcomes like these, integrity decides whether the result is trusted.

What is recorded or enforcedOpenStandard
Navigation, timing and connection events✓✓
Copy, paste and print blockedOff✓
Fullscreen requiredOff✓
Focus watchdog with on-screen warningOff✓
Honour-code declaration before the startOff✓
Visible watermark identifying the candidateOff✓
Tamper-evident event log✓✓

After the exam: three layers

Answer pattern

Who answered like whom?

Shared wrong answersPair analysis
Timing

Was the pace plausible?

Hard questions answered fastMatching timing
Behaviour

What happened on the screen?

Focus losses and time awayPaste and print attemptsFullscreen exitsDevice changes
UsualNothing stands out
One signalOne layer shows something
To reviewWorth a closer look

Numbers are only shown when there is enough data for them to mean something, and the wording is always "observation". Two evidence tools answer "who saw this screenshot?" from the watermark or from the order of the options visible in the image.

ValueWhen collusion is suspected, the board has evidence it can put in front of an appeals panel.

Learn

Results and question quality

Scoring is automatic on submission. When an error turns up in the answer key, staff correct it and rescore the whole exam in one step. Reports go down to the individual question, and every figure traces back to the candidate answers behind it.

Candidate results

For candidates

  • Passed or not passed, score and pass mark
  • Percentile and cohort mean
  • Score by category, and the cohort distribution
  • Question-by-question feedback, if enabled

The board decides per exam how much is shown.

Exam report

For the exam chair

  • Mean, median, standard deviation
  • KR-20 reliability and standard error
  • Angoff cut score and pass rate
  • By category, location, country and year of training

Export to CSV, JSON and ExamManager XML.

Item analysis

For the committee

  • Difficulty, discrimination, point-biserial
  • How often each option was chosen
  • Tracked across every exam and version
  • Weak items colour-coded in the pool

Committees prune the bank on evidence.

examfolio · Exam report
Screenshot: the exam report

Headline statistics, the score distribution and the breakdown by country, with the export menu open.

ScreenshotFigure 9. The exam report. A second screenshot of a question's performance tab can sit beside it.

Did the question separate strong candidates from weak ones?

A correct-answer rate says how hard a question was. The difficulty index shows which questions were too easy or too hard. The point-biserial correlation goes further: it compares how candidates did on one question with how they did on the whole exam. A question answered correctly mostly by strong candidates discriminates well. One that strong and weak candidates answer alike may be ambiguous or off target.

These figures are a signal for the experts to weigh. After each exam, the committee decides what happens to each question.

RetainPerforming well. Stays in the bank.
ReviseUnexpected statistics. Back to the subject experts.
RecycleA good question, reused in a later exam under your policy.
RetireConsistently weak. Kept out of future exams.
ValueFigures appear once they can be trusted: item performance after 100 candidates and timing after 50. Committees prune and refresh the bank on evidence.

Working with us

Configured around your programme

Every board has its own governance, its own question development process and its own rules. You keep the way your organisation already works. We configure Examfolio around it with you, and the configuration can change as your programme develops.

Review workflowStatuses, who may move a question between them, and where a comment is required.
Question structureActive formats, categories, difficulty and quality scales, tags and filter groups.
CurriculumYour own three-level curriculum tree.
LanguagesThe languages your exams are translated into.
Candidates and resultsSelf-registration, pass marks, mark scales and what candidates are shown.
Your brand and helpLogos, colours, and help pages, FAQ and writing guidelines under the Help menu.
ValueYou move onto Examfolio without redesigning your examination programme, and gain room to improve it along the way.

Working with us

Moving to Examfolio

Existing customers move with everything intact: users merged by email, every question with its full version history, media, comments, tags, curriculum and translations, every exam set and delivered exam, every candidate answer and result, and every test centre and contact.

86automated checks validate each migration
Score for scoreevery candidate matched against the old system
Full historyversion chains kept for every question
Side by sidelegacy published figures shown beside recomputed ones

A migration is accepted only after the checks pass. Migrated exams state clearly what they cannot show, and the legacy import and export formats remain available afterwards.

ValueYears of exam history becomes an asset in the new platform, proven before you go live.

Working with us

Security and data

Your content stays yoursQuestions and everything else you enter remain your intellectual property, and can be exported.
Separate workspacesOne organisation per workspace, with data fully separated between organisations.
No permanent super-adminSupport access is time-limited and logged.
Tamper-evident logsEvery exam session keeps a verified event log, and every question its full history.
Retention you setIntegrity data is kept for as long as your organisation decides.
Protected loginsLogin throttling and lockout are built in.
Hosted for youA standard web application. Candidates need only a modern browser.

Working with us

On the roadmap

AI: find gaps for new questions

Planned

Suggest topics and curriculum areas that offer room for new questions.

AI: variations of existing questions

Planned

New scenarios and wording that test the same learning objective.

AI: distractor suggestions

Planned

A list of plausible distractors for the author to choose from.

Per-question timers

Planned

Time limits on individual questions, and a no-backtrack mode.

Lockdown browser profile

Planned

An integrity profile using Safe Exam Browser.

Item drift detection

Planned

Spot questions whose performance shifts from one exam to the next.

Thresholds tuned to you

Planned

Integrity cut-offs calibrated against your own history once enough sessions exist.

See your own exam in Examfolio

We will walk your exam office and committee through a full cycle, from first question to final report.

Book a demo